Sunday, June 5, 2022

My Ranking of the Best Picture Oscar Winners: From Worst to Best (Vol. 4)

We've finally made it to the penultimate edition!

Thing are starting to heat up a little bit and as we inch closer to the 20s, we will start to see films that I do consider myself to be a fan of even if they weren't my actual choice in the grand scheme. 

One of my more controversial rankings will be occurring pretty quickly, and if you are a film buff, you will probably immediately know which film I mean when it pops up.

So, let's continue with Volume 4!

--------------------

#39 - FROM HERE TO ETERNITY (1953)

Directed by Fred Zinneman 

Written by Daniel Taradash & James Jones

For what it is, From Here to Eternity works as a fairly melodramatic film that succeeds mainly from the success of its ensemble.

I have come to notice that to be a big trend with a lot of these winners: the actors save the day! A lot of the time, that is true even at the expense of the directors and the screenwriters.

Not sure I have much to say about this one...in some ways, it sort of serves as a solid middle-of-the-road film for me.

When it comes to 1953, I actually tend to side with Tokyo Story as my favorite film for that year. Considering I have also called that my favorite film of the 1950s as a whole, needless to say that puts a lot of pressure on From Here to Eternity to hit that level. It could've come close but it simply doesn't.

________________________________________

#38 - GONE WITH THE WIND (1939)

Directed by Victor Fleming

Written by Margaret Mitchell & Sidney Howard

I have never been a big fan of Gone With The Wind...and this was even before I truly understood the more problematic elements of the material. 

What is really pushing this film as high as it is can really only be traced back to Vivien Leigh, Clark Gable, Hattie McDaniel, Olivia de Havilland, Thomas Mitchell, and Butterfly McQueen. 

I also do feel that Victor Fleming (although some of this film may not even be truly attributed to him) did a fantastic job from a directorial standpoint. 

The scope of the film is one to marvel at, especially for its time. Some of the cinematography is simply gorgeous, to say the least.

Still though...this movie plays like southern propaganda and tends to sympathize with Confederate tendencies.

For a film that is often considered the finest piece of entertainment to come out of the supposed "Greatest Year of American Cinema", I think that it is the wrong choice to say the least.

1939 also gave us The Wizard of Oz, The Rules of the Game, Goodbye Mr. Chips, Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, Stagecoach, Ninotchka....I mean...I don't give much of a damn about Gone with the Wind.

___________________________________

#37 - NOMADLAND (2020) 

Written and Directed by Chloe Zhao

I wanted to love Nomadland, but I didn't quite see the same level of rapturous love that many seemed to pour upon it.

I did, however, admire the film for the most part. 

I appreciated the story that was told; I appreciated that Zhao was able to adapt real-life Nomads into the film with seeming ease; and I think McDormand and Strathairn also slipped right into the world in a very believable way that didn't make it seem like they were famous actors posing as Nomads.

The remarkable thing about Frances McDormand is she is one of those celebrities who simply doesn't give a damn about glamour or impressing anybody. She cares about doing the work and going home...and to think she managed to win a THIRD Best Actress Oscar (only Katharine Hepburn has achieved that) when she didn't campaign a single bit the whole season aside from participating in some online events to support Zhao and the film crew was quite the feat in of itself.

I do think Nomadland has an issue in that it almost paints Amazon as a savior to McDormand's Fern in that working for them allows her to basically live without a steady job for most of the year. I hesitate at giving Amazon any credit there...but I do feel that Nomadland offered a unique movie experience and I think it was a bold decision for the Academy to embrace it.

As it stands, my favorite films from 2020 included:

Quo Vadis, Aida?

The Father

Never Rarely Sometimes Always 

Sound of Metal

Promising Young Woman

Black Bear

Minari

Shiva Baby

____________________________

#36 - THE LOST WEEKEND (1945)

Directed by Billy Wilder

Written by Billy Wider, Charles Brackett, Charles Jackson

When discussing the filmography of Billy Wilder, most people tend to reference Sunset Boulevard, Double Indemnity, Some Like it Hot, and The Apartment. I never hear as many people discuss The Lost Weekend, but even though I think I would probably rank the film behind the others of his I just listed, I think The Lost Weekend was a very admirable effort in showing the horrors of a drunken bender.

Ray Milland was considered something of a B-level actor prior to The Lost Weekend but Wilder saw something in him and with this film, he gave a truly realistic performance as lovely and depressed alcoholic.

I think that is truly the biggest success within the film is how well it depicts this gritty weekend bender and doesn't shy away from the disgusting nature of it. 

It doesn't pander and it doesn't try to sugar coat it. Considering they just gave Best Picture to a film like Going My Way the year prior, I commend them for going for a darker film like this...even if some may claim it was a make-up choice for not honoring Double Indemnity the year before.

My favorite films from 1945 were both foreign offerings. The first was Marcel Carne's Children of Paradise and Roberto Rosselini's Rome: Open City.

_________________________________

#35 - THE SHAPE OF WATER (2017)

Directed by Guillermo del Toro

Written by Guillermo del Toro & Vanessa Taylor

I was still not fully immersed in following films for most of the 2010s, so when I saw the trailer for The Shape of Water for the first time, I thought it looked intriguing and was especially excited to see Guillermo del Toro out with a new film.

What I didn't expect was for a film like that to become an Oscar contender...and even more surprising that it ended up winning the whole shebang!

I am almost surprised that the film pulled off the win not just because of its fantasy/science-fiction themes, but rather that it did seem to cause a lot of division amongst audiences.

For me, I very much enjoyed the film and thought del Toro created a such a fascinating world all within the confines of 1962 Baltimore (and to think that the antics of Hairspray would be happening at the same time....)

I also think that Sally Hawkins was luminous in this and that Richard Jenkins, Octavia Spencer, and Michael Shannon all provided truly strong supporting performances.

It was a visual feast of a film with a truly great score and a core relationship that seemed highly unlikely to be the lead of an Oscar winning film: woman has sex with a fish man.

I never thought we'd see that kind of film, let alone have it when Best Picture.

As it stands, I think it was a worthy winner though it was not my personal choice. I would give higher marks to Phantom Thread, Three Billboards, and Ladybird.

_________________________________

#34 - CHICAGO (2002)

Directed by Rob Marshall

Written by Bill Condon

After Moulin Rouge had paved the way for musicals to return to the big screen the year prior, Chicago came in the next year with a vengeance...and it also had the help of Harvey Weinstein.

Weinstein aside, I still think this adaptation of Chicago was very well done. Marshall's intention to have all of the numbers coming from inside Roxie's head was a brilliant decision (and the cutting of the song "Class" because it didn't fit that directorial vision was the difficult but correct choice).

Zellweger's performance works but, to me, it hasn't aged as well. 

Catherine Zeta-Jones, however, still owns the film and even upon a fairly recent rewatch, I was quite impressed with how much she could command the screen.

Looking back at the film's trajectory, it is still kind of surprising it managed to catch hold like it did with the awards circuit...but it was an immensely entertaining effort.

I do think movies like Talk to Her, City of God, The Pianist, Far From Heaven, and Catch Me If You Can have managed to stand the test of time a little better though.

___________________________________

#33 - PATTON (1970)

Directed by Franklin J. Schaffner

Written by Francis Ford Coppola & Edmund H. North

War movies aren't necessarily my cup of tea. However, despite the stuffy nature of Patton, I have to give credit to the performance of George C. Scott, a truly phenomenal actor who doesn't nearly get enough praise these days.

When he won the Oscar, he was not present. In fact, he made a big fuss about his hatred of awards to the point that when Goldie Hawn announced him as the winner, she sighed "Oh my god...the winner is George C. Scott" and preceded to laugh.

This was at a time when a lot of actors began bemoaning the legitimacy and reasoning of why awards needed to be handed out in the first place. Aside from Scott, you had Glenda Jackson, Marlon Brando, and Dustin Hoffman...although as mentioned before, Hoffman's vitriol was more over the fact that he lost to John Wayne for True Grit...and I think most actors would have a right to be angry about that.

As it stands, George C. Scott was simply fantastic as the titular Patton. He makes the film a must-see event in a lot of ways. It does feel overlong, and it does tend to drag (yet another trend I tend to point out with these films), but I would most definitely recommend the film be viewed for the sake of Scott's work.

1970 was actually not the best year for film. I would say my favorite film from that year was Women in Love, which doesn't exactly stand up with the best films of the rest of the 1970s, but it is a truly interesting piece by Larry Kramer containing a wonderful Oscar winning performance by Glenda Jackson...who also stayed away that evening because she didn't give a damn.

________________________________

#32 - THE DEPARTED (2006)

Directed by Martin Scorsese

Written by William Monahan, Alan Mak, Felix Chong

There was such a sense of joy when Martin Scorsese finally managed to win Best Director. This was something that was 30 years in the making after he had been ridiculously snubbed for a nomination for Taxi Driver and then missed out on his bids for films like Raging Bull, Goodfellas, and The Aviator.

That particular evening, in one fell swoop, he netted both Director and Picture and all seemed right in the world.

Then the dust settled and, at least for me, he basically won for lesser work.

Katharine Hepburn once famously said (although it was regarding acting) that all the right actors win Oscar, but for the wrong performances. 

In the case of Scorsese, he won for the wrong movie. Among the nominees, I honestly would've given Best Director to Paul Greengrass for United 93, but that was never going to happen. 

Scorsese should've won for GoodFellas, Taxi Driver, and Raging Bull...and I say that as someone who (gasp) doesn't really worship Raging Bull. 

The Departed is a fun movie and it felt like a great mix of Scorsese returning to his roots but with a modern flair after taking a more "artsy" detour with films like The Aviator, Gangs of New York, Kundun, and The Age of Innocence.

It is a killer ensemble, too. DiCaprio, Damon, Nicholson, Wahlberg, Farmiga...

Can't go wrong there! 

2006 was one of my favorite years for cinema. It would certainly make a top 10 list of best years for film quite easily.

Pan's Labyrinth, Children of Men, Little Miss Sunshine, The Lives of Others, Thank You For Smoking, The Devil Wears Prada, United 93, The Queen, Borat, Inland Empire, Notes on a Scandal, Volver, Letters from Iwa Jima....you get the idea.

_____________________________

#31 - BIRDMAN (2014)

Directed by Alejandro G. Inarritu

Written by Alejandro G. Inarritu, Armando Bo, Nicolas Giacobone, Alexander Dinelaris

I can recall being a little surprised with Birdman won Best Picture...but that was also at a time when I wasn't following the award season as much as I had in the late 90s and into the 2000s. 

My expectation was that Boyhood was on track to win a lot more, but I also had my heart devoted to two other films in the race: Selma and The Grand Budapest Hotel. 

However, this is a case where I am not going to bash the movie as I actually quite liked Birdman.

I thought the "one-shot" gimmick worked well, I thought Michael Keaton did a great job and was more worthy of the Oscar than Eddie Redmayne, I loved the theatrical setting which doesn't feel as frequently used in film these days.

I feel like we are sort of seeing the tides change now to the point where the films I am bringing up are films I do truly like, but other movies I just tend to like a tad more with each new slot.

_______________________________

#30 - THE BEST YEARS OF OUR LIVES 

Directed by William Wyler

Written by Robert E. Sherwood & MacKinlay Kantor

I feel like The Best Years of Our Lives used to get a bad rap for being the film that beat It's a Wonderful Life for the Oscar. 

I also get the sense that more people have grown to appreciate the film over the years, and I would say I am among that group, too.

When it comes to somewhat melodramatic kitchen sink dramas that feature WWII, or the ending of it, as a backdrop, it is hard to really find much to fault with The Best Years of Our Lives.

Sure, it is a truly monumental thing for these soldiers to be able to come home from the war, but what this film chooses to focus on is what makes it a lot more fascinating.

Cpt. Fred Derry is returning home to a loveless marriage.

Sgt. Al Stephenson is coming home to a family that has grown up and doesn't even truly know him.

Navy sailor Homer Parrish is now having to prepare to live life without his hands.

 While it may have its moments of being a bit too on-the-nose, I would say a lot of the emotional weight of the film is more than earned. Considering most of the films that had won Oscars within its first 20 years of existence, I think The Best Years of Our Lives stands as one of the best...even if it was only my 2nd favorite film of 1946. My favorite would've been A Matter of Life & Death.

_________________________________

#29 - UNFORGIVEN (1992)

Directed by Clint Eastwood 

Written by David Webb Peoples

As I stated when discussing Million Dollar Baby, I am not overly fond of Eastwood as a director...but the finest achievement of his career would have to be Unforgiven. 

Westerns are certainly not my forte, as I have stated, but everything about Unforgiven makes for a truly gripping experience. Eastwood is certainly in his wheelhouse here and he manages to get a truly marvelous villainous performance out of Gene Hackman, netting him his 2nd Oscar.

I feel like the script does have slight issues in terms of its use of exposition, but the whole final result is certainly one of the better experiences I have had viewing a western.

When it comes to 1992 as a year of film, I tend to consider my #1 choice to be Spike Lee's epic biopic of Malcolm X, which was snubbed for most major nominations. I do want to also commend nominees Howards End and The Crying Game, two great British imports that left indelible impressions...although the latter has since left a lot to unpack in terms of its political correctness.

_____________________________

#28 - CHARIOTS OF FIRE (1981)

Directed by Hugh Hudson

Written by Colin Welland

This is easily going to be one of my more hated placements, I am sure. 

Do I think Chariots of Fire deserved to win Best Picture?

Technically, no. I actually preferred nominees Atlantic City and Reds over it. I also loved other films from that year more that weren't nominated like My Dinner with Andre, Pixote, and Arthur.

Still though, this is a list where I am ranking a list of 94 films that won Best Picture and based on that, I have to admit that I actually really like Chariots of Fire.

Sure, it might be a little stuffy and twee and too British in a cliched way, but I have always found myself far more drawn to this film as a Cinderella Story rather than something like Rocky.

I also can't ignore the iconic score by Vangelis, even though the main theme does admittedly seem a little out of place with the rhythm of the running...but whatever...that's just a nitpick.

___________________________________

#27 - A MAN FOR ALL SEASONS (1966)

Directed by Fred Zinneman

Written by Robert Bolt

Much like Chariots of Fire, I would say that A Man for All Seasons is a film that benefits more from the films that actually won the award rather than what lost. If we were to base this off of just the nominees it was up against, I much preferred Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? and, to a lesser extent, Alfie. I would also rank films like A Man & A Woman, Blowup, and The Battle of Algiers above it.

On its own merit, I do find A Man for All Seasons to be a sterling film, perhaps a little dull in its approach but it is an exquisitely made film with gorgeous sets and costumes plus the acting, yet again, becomes a major saving grace. 

Robert Shaw, most famous for being the grizzled Quint in Jaws, was a very refined British character actor and some of his best work is in this film as the infamous Henry VIII. Then you have Paul Scofield as Thomas More, which may be the prime example of being one of the best wins of the Best Actor category who didn't actually deserve the win. Frankly, that award should've gone to Richard Burton in Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?

A movie like this is a prime example of how something can be truly good, but it usually just comes down to a few films being more reared towards your taste instead.

______________________________

#26 - THE SOUND OF MUSIC (1965)

Directed by Robert Wise

Written by Ernest Lehman

The major success of The Sound of Music is kind of baffling in some ways. When the Original Broadway Production went up in 1959, many prominent critics deemed it outdated and too sweet...but the audiences loved it and it ended up tying for the Best Musical Tony Award with the now-mostly forgotten Pulitzer Prize-winning musical Fiorello! about the life of iconic NYC mayor Fiorello H. LaGuardia. 

In the process, they both beat Gypsy.

Maybe not the best decision looking back on it.

As it stands, the movie version of The Sound of Music also seems to have its share of detractors. The esteemed film critic Pauline Kael savaged it in her review leading to her being dismissed from the publication. Christopher Plummer, who played Georg von Trapp, famously called the film The Sound of Mucus for its saccharine sensibilities despite adoring his co-stars. 

It is one of those films that seems to always make it on "Best Of" lists but has a passionate group of detractors more than most other films.

While I will attest that I prefer The Shop on Main Street more as a film from that year, I do really love The Sound of Music and would consider it a bit of a guilty pleasure. I do try to watch it around the holidays every year just for the hell of it. 

One particular criticism I want to call out is that Julie Andrews and Christopher Plummer always claim that they tried hard to give the film a little more zest so that it wasn't too sweet. While this isn't on them, I do think it was a mistake they trimmed down the roles of the Baroness and Max. Taking out the two songs they prominently feature in: How Can Love Survive and No Way to Stop It do really take a certain edge out of the material that was sorely needed in the film. 

Say what you will about the live broadcast version of The Sound of Music from 2013, but I did love how much they stuck to the original libretto and kept those songs in.

_________________________________

#25 - MARTY (1955)

Directed by Delbert Mann

Written by Paddy Chayefsky

The remarkable thing about the track record of the winner of the Palme D'or, the Best Picture winner at the Cannes Film Festival, and the Academy Award for Best Picture is that only TWO films in the last 75 years have managed to win both prizes.

Several films would go on to be nominees, but it is sort of crazy to think that it would only line up twice as having the same winner.

Having Marty be one of those films seems quite surprising at first glance, but a movie like Marty proves that you don't need a big strapping budget and a glamorous locale...just a good script that tells a story about interesting characters.

A lot has been made fun of with Ernest Borgnine in the latter half of his career, but this is truly lovely work by him. 

I often talk a lot about movies missing "an edge" and those movies that suffer from a lack of an edge have an uphill battle. I am not saying Marty doesn't suffer from that, but I also feel like Marty is the best example of a movie like this done very well, if not completely right.

As it stands, 1955 did offer some movies that I adored perhaps more than Marty. 

Pather Panchali

Diabolique

Rififi

The Night of the Hunter 

Those would be my top 4, but Marty would definitely be my #5.

_________________________________

#24 - IT HAPPENED ONE NIGHT (1934)

Directed by Frank Capra

Written by Robert Riskin

As one of the last films to come out of the fascinating pre-Code era of early Hollywood, It Happened One Night remains a shining staple in the world of romantic comedies. 

Clark Gable and Claudette Colbert make for one of the best duos in a film, especially when discussing RomCom chemistry.

It is a very witty film that still manages to hold up a lot better than many of the films Hollywood embraced at that time...and it is no surprise that it was the first of only three films to win the Big 5 Oscars: Picture, Director, Actor, Actress, and Screenplay.

I have to say though: it does truly seem a crime that Bette Davis didn't actually get nominated that year for Of Human Bondage. Her work in that film showed an intensity that was certainly unlike the peers of that era. She was unparalleled in many ways.

I would actually say this may be the first potential instance where I would say my favorite film from that particular year won the award. 

______________________________

#23 - THE DEER HUNTER (1978)

Directed by Michael Cimino

Written by Michael Cimino & Deric Washburn

*SPOILERS FOR A NEARLY 45-YEAR-OLD FILM*

I feel like very few directors had such a quick ascend to acclaim and as quick a downfall as Michael Cimino. I also bet that a lot of you probably aren't even familiar with him by name.

After The Deer Hunter swept the Oscars, Cimino was basically as hot a commodity that seemed worthy to add to the New Hollywood group of directors like Coppola, Scorsese, Bogdonavich, Spielberg, de Palma, and Lucas.

That all changed with his maniacal and overbearing reputation that he received while making Heaven's Gate, which was released to great mockery and bashing in 1981 after a tumultuous filming.

But for one brief shining moment, Cimino had his Camelot.

The Deer Hunter was a truly dark and depressing film about the trials of going to war and how it affects you after the fact. You could think of it as the Vietnam version of The Best Years of Our Lives only you want to just sit and wallow in despair afterwards.

I actually had to act out a scene from this in an acting class when we were learning about acting on film. Mostly it was to get us to be able to cry on cue and to not oversell it to the backrow.

I had to portray Michael (DeNiro) when he watches his friend Nick (Walken) lose at Russian Roulette and dying right in front of him. The dialogue was basically "Nicky! No! No!" but it was hard not to be truly shaken by the scene. I mean, how could you not be devastated by the idea of watching a dear friend die right in front of you?

The Deer Hunter is a fabulous winner, however my favorite film from that year was Terrence Malick's Days of Heaven. I also want to give a shout-out to these other great films of 1978:

Autumn Sonata

Halloween

An Unmarried Woman

The Meetings of Anna

In a Year with 13 Moons

Dawn of the Dead

__________________________________

#22 - THE LORD OF THE RINGS: THE RETURN OF THE KING (2003)

Directed by Peter Jackson

Written by Fran Walsh, Peter Jackson, Phillipa Boyens

Perhaps another selection and placement on my ranking that may make some rather confused.

The Lord of the Rings trilogy is, as an adapted source material, an unparalleled success. Peter Jackson and his crew achieved something that most filmmakers never do: widespread acclaim and respect from passionate fans and critics alike.

My only thing is that despite the obviously breathtaking efforts it took to make these films, particularly the final installment referenced here, I just never connected to them on any deep level. 

To put it into perspective, if you didn't realize my taste at this point, my favorite films from 2003 were Lost in Translation, Memories of Murder, American Splendor, Oldboy, and In America.

Still though, it was simply a remarkable achievement and when comparing it against the 94 films on this list, I have to give it due credit.

____________________________

 #21 - ALL QUIET ON THE WESTERN FRONT (1930)

Directed by Lewis Milestone

Written by George Abbott

I still find myself shocked at how well I responded to All Quiet on the Western Front, and this is still having not seen it in over a decade.

With so many films that almost glamorize the horrors of war in years since the end of WWII, here we have an anti-war film made in 1930 that is blunt and yet far more humane in its approach than one might expect.

And to think, the script for the film was written by George Abbott, who would go on to be one of the premiere directors of musical theatre during the 40s and 50s. 

I also think the film was smart in not shying away from giving equal weight and sympathy to the German soldiers, who are seen so young and treated to such horror that you can't help but be angered at all of the innocent lives lost over such a heinous war.

Certain technical aspects of the film are understandably dated due to the fact it was made in FREAKING 1930 (!!), but I have to commend everything about this film as being very bold and for taking an approach towards war that still feels far more radical than most films treat the concept today.

___________________________________

CONCLUSION:

We are now within reach of the finish line!

Coming up next will be the top 20 selections of the 94 Best Picture winners.

Thanks for staying with me through these.

If you want an easy link to the other installments, here they are!





Tuesday, May 31, 2022

My Ranking of the Best Picture Oscar Winners: From Worst to Best (Vol. 3)

 

Oh, the joys of ranking so many films that didn't deserve to win Best Picture. That's the sad truth that I realized when trying to sort through these films.

While it does come down to the whole "art is subjective" idea, I still think it is crazy that within the Academy's 90+ year history that they've only matched up with my personal choice maybe a dozen times...if even that. That stat is not even factoring in the films that were actually snubbed for a nomination that I would've preferred over the winner.

With this volume, we will be cracking the top 50 but it will still take a while until we reach the films that I felt were at least worthy of a nomination.

So, let us begin!

--------------------

#59 - MRS. MINIVER (1942)

Directed by William Wyler

Written by George Froeschel, Claudine West, James Hilton, Arthur Wimperis, Jan Struther

Another big barrage of screenwriters for this one.

I think the biggest issue with Mrs. Miniver relies a lot on its focus. There is a major bonus in that the lead of the film is Greer Garson, a very compelling actress who dominated film in the 1940s but doesn't seem to get a lot of traction today when discussing actresses of the supposed Golden Age of Hollywood.

However, this is a film which basically shows us upper middle-class white people and their upper middle-class white problems as a backdrop to the early days of WWII.

A solid effort nonetheless, although I still feel like the real classic from 1942 was Yankee Doodle Dandy.

_______________________________

#58 - WINGS (1927)

Directed by William Wellman

Written by Louis Lighton, John Monk Saunders, Hope Loring

We've reached an important milestone with this selection, because Wings was the very first film to win the Academy Award for Best Picture. Although, at that ceremony, they actually awarded two films with Production awards.

Outstanding Picture to Wings

Best Unique & Artistic Picture to Sunrise

Soon after, it was decided that Wings was the sole winner. 

I actually think Wings is a solid film and definitely an impressive film for its time...though I still don't think it is anything too remarkable by today's standards. I feel like other silent films prior to invention of the Academy Awards were able to achieve so much more out of content and style.

I actually wish they rewarded Sunrise as I consider that to be one of the crown jewels of the Silent Film era.

At any rate, Wings was still an admirable choice, but I might've voted for Seventh Heaven out of the small nominee list they provided.

____________________________________

#57 - ALL THE KING'S MEN (1949)

Directed by Robert Rossen

Written by Robert Rossen & Robert Penn Warren

There is something that feels so prescient about All the King's Men when thinking about today's political climate...and yet, the film doesn't quite get to the level to necessarily overwhelm you.

The film tells the story of a small rural politician who manages to rise from a lowly city council member seat all the way to becoming Governor. The film does suffer a lot from clunky pacing, and I think it is a shame because this is the kind of story that can end up becoming truly addictive to sit through. Think of something like House of Cards for example.

 I do think that the performances by Broderick Crawford and Mercedes McCambridge are both top notch. Their energy is what manages to keep the film afloat.

My favorite film of 1949 was Yosujiro Ozu's Late Spring, but I was also quite fond of the following:

The Third Man, Kind Hearts & Coronets, A Family Like Many Others, The Heiress, White Heat, Stray Dog, and A Letter to Three Wives

_______________________________

#56 - MY FAIR LADY (1964)

Directed by George Cukor

Written by Alan Jay Lerner

When it comes to the canon of musicals, I think one of the more well-known and admired pieces is My Fair Lady. I can't deny that some of the score is quite beautiful, and I also can't deny the iconic nature of the performances. As it stands, this is a musical that I never fully connected with, and I think a lot of the energy within the film is lost.

I do feel like it was a mistake for them to pass up on Julie Andrews for the role, but Audrey Hepburn does act the role of Eliza Doolittle very well. I just think this is a case of me simply not preferring the material, but I do think the outcome was nearly as good as they could've probably managed.

The real winner here was Dr. Strangelove with Julie Andrews' actual film debut Mary Poppins being a close second.

I do want to give a shoutout to Woman in the Dunes, The Pumpkin Eater, and Seance on a Wet Afternoon.

_____________________________

#55 - THE KING'S SPEECH (2010)

Directed by Tom Hooper

Written by David Seidler 

Another infamous winner in that the entire award season seemed to be progressing towards a coronation of The Social Network only for the PGA, DGA, and BAFTA to swoop in an entirely different direction and change the tide for The King's Speech. 

Normally, I would love a movie like The King's Speech. The simple truth is that I found its presentation to be very static and stale...which makes Hooper's directing win over Fincher and Aronofsky or the snubbed Christopher Nolan to be truly laughable. 

This film would've been down the list maybe another 10 or so spots had it not been for the acting trio of Colin Firth, Geoffrey Rush, and Helena Bonham Carter. It is amazing how much a good performance or two (or three) can make a difference in a film, but it certainly isn't enough for me to think the film was even close to being worthy of a Best Picture win.

That is especially the case when The Social Network, Toy Story 3, Black Swan, and Inception are right there.

____________________________

#54 - SPOTLIGHT (2015)

Directed by Tom McCarthy

Written by Tom McCarthy & Josh Singer

The Best Picture win by Spotlight sort of makes sense in retrospect.

Its relatively widespread appeal along with its key support from the Screen Actors Guild and Writers Guild made it the likely choice to prevail on a preferential ballot over the more divisive films The Big Short and The Revenant. 

Of the three films, I actually preferred The Big Short, but it is easy to see why a film like Spotlight was going to sneakily slip under the radar. 

The subject matter delves into the Boston Globe reporters who were trying to unearth the Catholic Church's connections in protecting Priests who were molesting children.

I felt like we were in for a tense film a la All the President's Men or even something similar to Zodiac but instead, the film just felt very boiler-plate and mostly forgettable. 

I might be willing to give it another chance someday, but in the end, I found it just to be a slightly above average film that didn't try to take a lot of chances.

Oh, and Carol was robbed.

_____________________________

 #53 - TERMS OF ENDEARMENT (1983)

Written and Directed by James L. Brooks

Coming off of a successful career in television, James L. Brooks managed to break the barrier between the two and gave us a film that seemed to really bridge the divide of comedy and tragedy.

Terms of Endearment was based on a novel by Larry McMurtry, but Brooks added a character not in the novel to be played by Jack Nicholson to give Aurora Greenway (Shirley MacLaine) a little bit of a lighter edge.

I will admit to never having read the novel, but I do feel like the scenes between MacLaine and Nicholson are truly delightful.

I do think despite the fact that this became a major awards vehicle for MacLaine, I actually preferred Debra Winger as her daughter. Their erratic and often toxic chemistry, which seemed aided by the fact they didn't really get along well in real life, makes the film a lot richer.

However, I just don't really view the film as being that remarkable...but this is a case where despite the lower ranking, I probably would've given this Best Picture out of the nominees they selected. 

My favorite movie from that year, however, was the final theatrical film of Ingmar Bergman: Fanny & Alexander.

I also feel like this film ended up setting extremely high expectations of people towards Brooks as a filmmaker...and I think it ended up hurting him as he didn't receive Best Director nominations for the two films of his that got Best Picture nods following this: Broadcast News and As Good as it Gets.

I will say that I found his finest film to be Broadcast News which was so sharp and witty and contained a truly magnificent performance by Holly Hunter in what was her breakout role.

______________________________

#52 - RAIN MAN (1988)

Directed by Barry Levinson

Written by Ronald Bass & Barry Morrow

Rain Man is another case of a film that has greatly dipped in esteem for me over the years. There was a time when I would've called this one of my favorite winners of all time and that Dustin Hoffman gave one of the finest performances in the history of cinema.

So, what happened? 

The film is still mostly entertaining, though I can't deny that it begins to suffer from a little bit of lethargic pacing once it gets to the final third, post-Vegas. 

Though a lot of what hurts the film IS Dustin Hoffman. I wouldn't even say it is necessarily his fault, but I do feel like more has been researched and conveyed these days as to how autism actually can be. 

While the film was certainly groundbreaking and important for its time, I feel like what it offers hasn't aged well in terms of presenting a mental disability.

I actually feel like Tom Cruise gives one of his best performances here. He's such a jackass but I do truly believe him by the end that he absolutely loves his brother. As a character arc, Cruise sells this rather well.

One thing I do have to highly praise though? Hans Zimmer's score is iconic and truly unique and brilliant. This was the score that put him on the map and for good reason, too!

What are some of the best films of 1988, which just so happens to be the year of my birth?

Cinema Paradiso and Who Framed Roger Rabbit? are two that come to mind.

_________________________________

#51 - TITANIC (1997)

Written and Directed by James Cameron 

I am truly perplexed by Titanic.

Here we have a film that is essentially a very cliche-ridden love story following a Romeo & Juliet-like template about a poor man and a rich woman falling in love despite all the obstacles...and then we put them on the RMS Titanic.

Not only is that kind of love story a tale as old as time, the script in which we get it conveyed to us is...ummm...how should I put this....badly written? Yeah, we will go with that.

Titanic is not a masterpiece, and it may run over three hours long with a script that has some truly unintentionally humorous dialogue...but I can't deny that the film somehow works.

James Cameron was able to right the ship (no pun intended) through the scope of the visual effects and the action. As much as the script suffers, he manages to pace it quite effectively and a lot of the pay offs work splendidly.

Acting wise, DiCaprio and Winslet are fine but neither of them give their best work. Winslet herself has often said she can't stand her performance in this film or how her American accent comes across...though she has since become one of the best at adapting to various American accents with her recent work perfecting the Delco accent on Mare of Easttown being truly wonderful.

Titanic was a major phenomenon...and I think it might be hard to find that perfect mix of audience and critical and voting body approval to lead to an Oscar win these days. 

As it stands, I much prefer Boogie Nights, The Sweet Hereafter, L.A. Confidential, Funny Games, Happy Together, and Eve's Bayou from 1997.

_____________________________________

#50 - HAMLET (1948)

Directed by Laurence Olivier 

Written by Laurence Olivier (adapting text from Shakespeare)

We've made it to the top 50!

Simply put, there is a reason why Olivier is such a legend. He manages to make the text of Shakespeare come alive in such a vivid way that very few can.

This adaptation of Hamlet mostly suffers due to its truncated form. This is actually the same reason I feel like Joel Coen's recent adaptation of The Tragedy of Macbeth suffered somewhat.

Nevertheless, Olivier's choices in his visual aesthetic here are worth praising. He almost comes off as going for a German Expressionist take...which is also sort of what Coen went for with Macbeth.

It feels very avant-garde by 1940s standards so in that regard, I can commend the film a great deal.

I would nominate Hamlet for Best Picture, but the other films that would've received higher slots were:

Bicycle Thieves, The Red Shoes, Drunken Angel, The Treasure of Sierra Madre, Rope, Letter from an Unknown Woman

_____________________________

#49 - PLATOON (1986) 

Written and Directed by Oliver Stone

While some films on this list have dropped in esteem for me in recent years, Platoon is actually the opposite case.

While I am still not overly enamored with the film as some might be...and that is typically the case with Oliver Stone's filmography...I did take to the film a lot more when I watched again for a second time several years ago. 

I think one of the biggest flaws of the film is that of Charlie Sheen's Chris. As a lead, he is simply unremarkable, and he disappears next to his co-stars like Willem Dafoe and Tom Berenger. 

Oliver Stone's massive success that included two Best Director Oscar wins within the span of 3 years has since greatly dimmed as many seemed to catch on to his limitations as a filmmaker.

I would argue that Platoon is one of his more tolerable efforts by default.

Platoon managed to beat out one of the better efforts by Woody Allen: Hannah and Her Sisters along with one of the finer Merchant/Ivory offerings: A Room with a View...but two of the best films that year were robbed of a nomination: Blue Velvet and Stand by Me.

______________________________

#48 - THE STING (1973)

Directed by George Roy Hill

Written by David S. Ward

 The combination of Robert Redford and Paul Newman is certainly cause for charisma overload; throw in the truly electric character actor that is Robert Shaw and you are in for a delight.

Well, mostly.

The Sting is a film that works mostly thanks to the charisma of its ensemble and also the added bonus of its Ragtime infused Scott Joplin score. 

It succeeds well at what it does and manages to be a delightful diversion, but I guess a lot of it depends on if you see immense award potential in those kinds of movies as opposed to watching a movie about a family of sisters grieving.

Probably not a surprise to you, but yes, I much preferred Bergman's outing Cries & Whispers from this year.

Also, George Lucas really did do a lovely job with American Graffiti even if it was an abhorrent decision to not give the women characters their own postscript epilogue bios.

____________________________

#47 - HOW GREEN WAS MY VALLEY (1941)

Directed by John Ford

Written by Phillip Dunne & Richard Llewellyn

After talking about various films beating a more popular acclaimed film:

Crash beating Brokeback Mountain

Shakespeare in Love beating Saving Private Ryan

Dances with Wolves beating Goodfellas

I feel like the OG example of a film that often gets a lot of flack for the film it beat out is How Green Was My Valley, which took the crown from a little film called Citizen Kane...and also, The Maltese Falcon seems to even have more esteem and respect these days.

Did How Green Was My Valley deserve to win? No.

However, I certainly don't consider it a bad film. I am not even saying that as someone who loves Citizen Kane because despite the film's amazing achievements from a technical standpoint, I am not overly enamored with it.

I still would've given it the top honor for what Welles was able to accomplish with it, but even so, I also was more entertained by The Maltese Falcon and Sargent York.

I do have to commend How Green Was My Valley for being far more willing to not shy away from the horrors of the coal mining industry and for actually finding moments of strong heartfelt emotion that didn't come across as cheap or cloying. That is a major plus considering the time period it came out in.

_______________________________________

#46 - THE LAST EMPEROR (1987)

Directed by Bernardo Bertolucci

Written by Bernardo Bertolucci, Mark Peploe, Enzo Ungari, Aisin-Gioro Puyi

I am not sure I have as much to say about The Last Emperor. 

In terms of big sprawling historical epics, it is simply a sumptuous film that is directed extremely well and contains a very solid ensemble with Joan Chen standing out in particular

Still though, it suffers yet again from being a bit overlong and mostly taking on a very hollow and superficial approach. 

I could see why the Academy of the time responded well to it, but I wouldn't see voters going for it today. 

I mentioned Broadcast News earlier which was one of the best films of 1987, but other films from that year I loved were Au Revoir Les Enfants, Moonstruck, Babette's Feast, The Princess Bride, Full Metal Jacket, Where is Friend's House?, Raising Arizona, Whitnail & I, and Prick Up Your Ears.

______________________________________

#45 - KRAMER VS. KRAMER (1979)

Directed by Robert Benton 

Written by Robert Benton & Avery Corman

I probably like Kramer vs. Kramer more than most people do. I think the craziest thing about it is that for its time, a film about a divorce was groundbreaking as no film had truly tackled the topic.

Sure, I would've preferred All That Jazz or Apocalypse Now to win from the nominees, but I think there is a lot to really like about this film.

Dustin Hoffman won a deserved Oscar for this performance and he worked tremendously well with young Justin Henry who gives one of the best performances by a child in a film ever. He is so natural and effortless in this and you can really sense how much he trusted Hoffman.

A lot has been said about the more method approach that Hoffman took with his co-star, this woman named Meryl Streep who never worked again.

Streep has said that prior to the first take in which she tells Hoffman she is leaving him, he slapped her hard across the face to give her the frazzled motivation.

First of all, this is Meryl Streep we are talking about. I think she can manage just fine on her own.

Streep won her first of 3 Oscars for this performance and I still think this is some of her best work. She is gone for most of the first half of the film but leaves a lasting impression with her departure in the first scene...and then does lovely work when she tries to come back to get custody for her son.

The film is an acting showcase and it does sort of surprise me that it ended up sweeping through when more fascinating directorial achievements were right there.

I don't begrudge it the win as much as others do...even if I did prefer films like All That Jazz, Apocalypse Now, The Marriage of Maria Braun, Being There, Alien, Breaking Away, and The Life of Brian.

________________________________

#44 - IN THE HEAT OF THE NIGHT (1967)

Directed by Norman Jewison

Written by Stirling Silliphant & John Ball

I mentioned this earlier when discussing Oliver! about the craziness of the 1967 Best Picture race and how it signaled potential new tides of change in the voting body of the Academy.

Bonnie & Clyde and The Graduate represented more of New Hollywood.

Guess Who's Coming to Dinner? tackled a very current and turbulent topic about interracial marriage in the same year the Supreme Court deemed it lawful...but told it in a very genteel way.

Then you have Doctor Doolittle, a nomination that Fox basically bought for a bloated musical that is easily in contention of being one of the worst nominations ever.

Somewhere in the middle of those films was In the Heat of the Night, which certainly had a grittier feel than Guess but still wasn't quite on the same level as the films that represented New Hollywood.

Its Best Picture win was seen as something of an upset as most expected The Graduate to pull it off. 

I remember seeing one person online try to make the claim that he was convinced the Academy changed the results as this ceremony was originally postponed due to the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

He felt that both The Graduate and Bonnie & Clyde seemed more likely but that due to the sudden dramatic political shift, they changed the votes from Screenplay and Picture to In the Heat of the Night.

This is certainly a stretch, but I do feel that there was enough drive at that time for them to want to acknowledge a film such as this.

I do have to commend the film for doing a good job at tackling the racial issue, but I also feel like its biggest problem is that it focuses too much on the murder plot that is actually not as interesting. The film works best when the racial tension is at full display...and Rod Steiger does a good job of keeping his character from turning into a complete White Savior.

In the end, the results are sort of mixed but when the film does hit, it hits quite well.

Aside from the New Hollywood films I mentioned, I have to give shoutout to one of the finest films Ingmar Bergman ever made: Persona.

_________________________________________

#43 - MIDNIGHT COWBOY (1969)

Directed by John Schlesinger 

Written by Waldo Salt & James Leo Herlihy

This might be the prime example of a film that I am truly proud of the Academy for choosing, but also find myself kind of underwhelmed at the same time.

I mentioned earlier how Midnight Cowboy was the first, and only, X-rated film to win Best Picture. To clarify, when I say "X-rated", I don't mean in the XXX porno sense. 

X-Rated at that time meant "No Children Admitted Under the Age of 18" with no exceptions. You could sort of compare to the NC-17 rating of today.

Not long after, its rating was downgraded to an R and it would still be the first R-rated film to win. Not really a major feat since the MPAA didn't truly come into effect until 1968.

Nevertheless, Midnight Cowboy winning was such a bold step in a different direction. 

The main reason to see this film is for the performances of Jon Voight and especially Dustin Hoffman, who gives one of the greatest performances of his career and he was simply robbed of the Oscar. In fact, he himself felt he was so worthy that he felt the award's credibility was questioned when he lost to the racist pig that is John Wayne. You could call it ego, but Hoffman was right in this case...plus he said just two years prior he felt he wasn't worthy of a win for The Graduate. 

This was the perfect follow-up to The Graduate where he mostly played everything at an understated and dry level, but here, he kicks up the sleaze and bravado. Truly remarkable. 

My favorite film of that year was Z, which was only the second foreign-language film to receive a Best Picture nomination.

______________________________________

#42 - AMERICAN BEAUTY (1999)

Directed by Sam Mendes

Written by Alan Ball

I was only 11 years old when American Beauty came out and while my mother was (thankfully) very lenient about the films I watched because she knew how much it meant to me, she refused for a few years for me to see American Beauty.

The concept of an older man lusting after a teenage girl understandably left her feeling like the film was in bad taste.

I can recall feeling a bit bummed if only for the fact that people kept raving and raving on how fantastic this film was and I felt like I was missing out.

I did eventually see the film once I was in high school...and honestly, it didn't fully live up to the hype for me.

Elements like the plastic bag floating in the wind with the pretentious monologue to go along with it really hit a false note, but I do have to commend the work by Kevin Spacey and Annette Bening.

I do feel like Sam Mendes' directing work here was splendid, especially considering it was his film debut after only working in the theatre prior.

From 1999, I would throw all of my roses towards Being John Malkovich, Magnolia, All About My Mother, Election, and The Talented Mr. Ripley.

_____________________________________

#41 - GRAND HOTEL (1932)

Directed by Edmund Goulding

Written by Vicki Baum

Way back when I was discussing Mutiny on the Bounty, I mentioned that there was only one other film that won Best Picture without winning a single other award.

That would be Grand Hotel and not only was it the only award it won, it was the only nomination it had.

I don't think we will ever see anything that crazy again, even if the "against all odds" win by Coda did occur this year.

 Grand Hotel is melodrama of the highest order. 

With the likes of Greta Garbo and also younger Joan Crawford giving one of the best performances of her career, there is a lot to enjoy about this film.

Adapted by the writer of the novel herself, Vicki Baum, the film is surprisingly good for its time at weaving the intricate plots and allowing a lot of them to breathe.

It might be a little stuffy at times, but overall, it is certainly a higher end selection from the early years of the Academy.

I do feel like if I had to vote though that year, I would've given my personal selection to I Am a Fugitive From a Chain Gang or Trouble in Paradise.

_______________________________________

#40 - ARGO (2012)

Directed by Ben Affleck 

Written by Chris Terrio


I have dimmed a bit on Argo as a film as well, but I do still find it to be incredibly entertaining.

I do remember the awards journey for this film, even if I wasn't fully invested with the award season or even films in general at that time.

Most people were talking about Steven Spielberg's Lincoln but then Argo began taking a lot of the televised precursor awards. It became even more crazy when Ben Affleck got snubbed for a Directing Oscar nom and then kept winning everywhere else.

When it comes to its biggest competition like Lincoln or The Silver Linings Playbook or The Life of Pi, I much prefer Argo which is why I was very happy with its win at the time.

However, of the actual nominees, my preference would've been Amour and Beasts of the Southern Wild.

I think Argo works as a great crowd-pleaser, but I also think it is pretty straight-forward and not particularly interesting in its approach or style. That is its biggest hurdle in the grand scheme.

___________________________________

CONCLUSION:

Another volume down!

We are inching very close to the best of the sort of best! 

In the end, I feel like this list of films is not as strong as it could be, but we are definitely getting closer to films that I feel a lot more strongly about.

Next up, my ranking will be 39-21 and then that will be followed by 20 to my #1 selection! 

________________________________

P.S. - Check out the other rankings below!

#94-80

#79-60

#39-21

#20-1

SO...I Am Officially a YouTuber! (AND A POSSIBLE FAREWELL TO THE BLOG)

It has been a long time coming, but I have finally started the YouTube channel I kept wanting to create for the last several years! The chan...