30 years.
In some ways, I could argue that 1993 is the first year that I have the most amount of vivid memories from...so it is hard to believe that it was 30 years ago. Of course, at the time, a lot of the movies on this list (save for one) weren't anywhere near my five year old radar.
Welcome back to my Anniversary Retrospective series where I am doing a spotlight on years of film that are celebrating milestone anniversaries this year. It is a series I do hope to continue next year, so needless to say, I should be able to keep this going for a little while.
Nothing has changed in terms of how I have felt about this journey. By that, I mean that I love being able to single out films that I may not normally talk about on my blog.
The problem with doing "Best of the Decade" lists is that it usually only allows you to name 1 or maybe 2 films from a given year...meanwhile, there are a few films that you may love that deserve to have a mention. This could even tie into more sentimental favorites that might not always be mentioned by others.
I would say that my list for 1993 is not too unusual. In fact, in a rather rare occurrence, FOUR of the five Best Picture nominees are on my list...but I also feel like it wasn't as vast a year in terms of the output.
I do have one film on my list (my #10 film) that might make some of you raise your eyebrows, but it falls into that "sentimental" category. Otherwise, we have some strong indies/foreign films (my go-to bread and butter) mixed in with the rather solid quartet of Best Picture nominees (including, spoiler alert, that year's winner).
So having said all of that, here are my 10 favorite films from 1993 that just so happen to be celebrating their 30th anniversary this year.
___________________________________________
#10 - ADDAMS FAMILY VALUES
(Barry Sonnenfeld)
When we talk about amazing film sequels from history, a lot of the time we look towards The Godfather Part II, The Empire Strikes Back, Toy Story 3, The Return of the King, among some others...but there is one sequel that I find to be absolutely remarkable and perhaps it is a film that would get scoffed by some for being placed on such a list.
In fact, the idea of me putting Addams Family Values on such a list might shock some of you...especially considering my lists often veer towards more indie and foreign films.
Maybe nostalgia is playing a factor here, but I do find that this was an absolutely glorious dark comedy that still holds up remarkably well.
I would've been around 5-6 years old when this first came out on VHS, and I had already seen and enjoyed the 1991 film (had yet to see the 60s TV series).
The campier elements of the film are what make it stand out so much, and these particular come from the new supporting players: The Grangers played by Christine Baranski and Peter MacNichol and particularly Joan Cusack as Debbie Jelinsky.
This is such a perfect villainous but comedic performance that is perfectly pitched in terms of the campy presentation.
As The Grangers, the two yuppie camp counselors who have probably spent too much time in Suffolk County, Baranski and MacNichol are simply hilarious and their absolutely random Thanksgiving pageant in the middle of the summer which ends in complete disarray is such a classic that I share the clips of it every Thanksgiving on most of my social media platforms.
All of the elements from the original are still there and wonderful in their own right. The late great Raul Julia is still the Gomez of my heart while Anjelica Huston will forever be Morticia Addams even if I know full well her catalog of work proves she is far more. Christopher Lloyd is such a delight as Uncle Fester and then you get the great character actress Dana Ivey sweeping in as the new wife of the hair full that is Cousin Itt.
I really did enjoy the 1991 film but there was just something magical about the tonal shifts and the plot of this one that worked so well...and I think the dynamics of putting Wednesday and Pugsley in a yuppie summer camp and pairing Fester with a murderous spouse just made for a sequel that simply felt more alive and invigorating.
________________________________
#9 - NAKED
(Mike Leigh)
Mike Leigh is one of those filmmakers who often has a sort of whimsy about him, but he will occasionally delve into bleaker territory.
You have a movie like Vera Drake, which deals with an illegal abortionist in Britain who faces charges and then you have a movie like Naked, which takes a man filled with rage and loathing and sets him out on an odyssey around London at night.
One could argue that the film is a bit brash and that it can get tiring to deal with Johnny as a "protagonist"...but the intensity and true conviction of David Thewlis in this role completely wins you over.
While he did receive major attention from critics groups, Thewlis would join the list of the most egregious Oscar snubs in history. This is a performance that was completely unrelenting in its approach and I think under less deft hands (and under a director not as skilled as Leigh), this would've been a disaster of a performance and a disaster of a film.
This is an odyssey through post-Thatcher London...right in the midst of the John Major premiership...and that anger and frustration over their hideous reign permeates this film. Sort of how you see the same aftershocks in a movie like The Full Monty four years later even though that film has a lot of heart.
In the Mike Leigh canon, this one is perhaps a literal cannonball...or a shard of glass. Sometimes those are the most fascinating films to watch and revisit despite how uncomfortable they might be.
_______________________________
#8 - IN THE NAME OF THE FATHER
(Jim Sheridan)
#7 - THE REMAINS OF THE DAY
(James Ivory)
________________________________
#6 - THE PIANO
(Jane Campion)
I have been under the impression that The Piano is like that for a lot of people. At the time that I truly started getting into films, I was of the opinion that The Piano was the kind of boring schlock that appealed to stuffy Oscar voters.
As the years went by, I noticed that there was a shift in the level of appreciation and attention that the film was receiving on various online film forums, and I ended up revisiting it when I was in college.
The Piano is one of the ultimate examples of a film that I truly admit I was wrong when I first saw it and now, I would say it is a truly well-done film that was exquisite in many ways.
The crazy thing to think about is that Jane Campion became only the second woman to be nominated for Best Director (and honestly would've likely won had it not been for the juggernaut that was Schindler's List), but I think it is abundantly clear that no one could ignore her work here. In terms of what she gets out of the material (her own Oscar-winning script), the setting, and her performers is nothing short of masterful.
Holly Hunter leads the show here with an Oscar winning performance, which is great on its own, even if I do think Angela Bassett or Stockard Channing were more deserving.
The performance that really steals the show is young Anna Paquin as her daughter Flora, who managed to win the Oscar in an upset over expected winner Winona Ryder for The Age of Innocence.
Paquin is a marvel in this. While she certainly was too young to understand a lot of context/content, Campion is able to get a performance out of her that is surprisingly rich and deep...AND she is able to blend into the background when she needs to.
She feels very real, but also rehearsed/fake when she needs to as she is, in some ways, kind of villainous to the film's trajectory.
As for the ending, I know Campion regrets how it went down (and I do think her original ending would've made more sense), but how it is staged and edited (involving the rope...IYKYK) is expertly done. Truthfully, I think Campion would have been a very viable contender to win for Director that year.
#5 - MOVING
(Shinji Somai)
________________________________
#4 - GROUNDHOG DAY
(Harold Ramis)
I was someone who ended up finding a lot of joy in dry, cynical comedy as I often had relatives who would watch British sitcoms on PBS...and I think the energy of Bill Murray really tied into this.
When I first saw Groundhog Day, it felt like I was witnessing lightening in a bottle. It is hard to claim that anything, let alone a film, is perfect.
But as far as comedies go, I think Groundhog Day is about as close to perfection as the genre can get.
Bill Murray is Phil Connors, a Pittsburgh-based weatherman who is being sent up to Punxsutawney to cover an event he dreads every year: Groundhog Day.
In tow are his new producer Rita (Andie MacDowell) and cameraman Larry (Chris Elliott). Larry is one of those guys who just doesn't care and does his job, while Rita is sort of taken by the charm of the small town and how happy its citizens are.
Phil, on the other hand: "They're hicks, Rita..."
I don't think I even have to say what the "twist" of the film is, but yes, Phil ends up reliving Groundhog Day over and over again.
No matter what he does...including a dark sequence where he tries committing suicide multiple times...he just keeps waking up in his bed on February 2nd with Sonny & Cher's "I Got You Babe" playing on the radio.
The sort of charming Frank Capra-esque ending it has doesn't feel like a cop-out, but it feels strangely earned after dealing with the cyncial comedy throughout the film.
The role of Phil feels so engrained into the style of Bill Murray that its hard to believe that any other actor was considered...and I do want to give a shout-out to the great character actor Stephen Tobolowsky, whose brief performance as Ned Ryerson is a prime example of how someone can take a small role and truly make it memorable based on great character work/direction.
While the category would've had too many viable contenders to win, I seriously would've nominated Tobolowsky for Supporting Actor...just like Murray was worthy of an Actor nom.
____________________________________
#3 - FAREWELL, MY CONCUBINE
(Chen Kaige)
#2 - SCHINDLER'S LIST
(Steven Spielberg)
____________________________________
#1 - THREE COLOURS: BLUE
(Krzysztof Kieslowski)
Although, one film that I found to be incredibly compelling in how it addresses grief and how it observes someone who is trying so hard not to acknowledge that grief is the first installment of Krzysztof Kieslowski's Three Colours trilogy: that very chilly color known as BLUE.
The Three Colours Trilogy was Kieslowski's magnum opus of sorts...and it was the final project he completed before he passed away in 1996. The other two installments both came out in 1994, which were White (a very good film) and Red (which is fantastic), but I think on an emotional level, Blue was undeniably the most potent.
You can't talk about the film without focusing on Juliette Binoche, who gives one of the best performances I have ever seen in a film.
When you think of "award winning" performances, the standard prototype that often comes up is an image of someone screaming or crying and emoting for the back row.
Binoche doesn't do that here. This is a performance all about restraint and how she is trying so hard to not express any of the turmoil she is feeling inside for the death of her husband and young son from a car accident.
Even at the end when Binoche sort of accepts the grief and is able to move on with her life so to speak, she doesn't overplay. It is a nice release of emotion that slowly bleeds into a smile. It is such a perfectly pitched performance that I feel should analyzed and studied for decades to come.
I sort of feel like I am going to end this on a bit of a copout, but this is one of those films where I just feel like I can't fully talk about it. I think it is a film that needs to be seen and experienced, and while I could try to go through the film and talk about more of the details, I don't really want to reveal more than I already have.
Blue is a film of great emotional elegance and is one of the best character studies ever captured in cinema history. It was able to move me in such a profound way that I often think about it even on a daily basis.
____________________________________